Sale on Manual & Electric Hospital Beds - Starting from 25 September!

✓ Certified Professional Seller

Texua Physiotherapy & Wellness Equipment

Texua JC01-60W

Product Code: PAWE-EAPD-3292

Sixty watts at the wall, one watt per square centimetre at the skin.

A 60-watt, 3 MHz therapeutic ultrasound console with an effective intensity of 1 watt per square centimetre, a duty cycle from 20 to 80 per cent, and an applicator held below 45 degrees: eight-inch screen, 3.5 kilograms.

Sections

Ultrasound Therapy Devices

Categories

Physiotherapy & Wellness Equipment

Condition

New

Origin

China

Seller Type

Certified Professional Seller

CE & ISO Certified

Global Shipping

Supplier: Medigear

Texua positions the JC01-60W as a 3 MHz therapeutic ultrasound console for physiotherapy and rehabilitation rooms. Machine power is published at 60 watts. Effective intensity reaches 1 watt per square centimetre; the duty cycle ranges from 20 to 80 per cent in automatic and continuous modes, and energy control runs from 1 to 10. The beam type is collimating, with a non-uniformity coefficient of 6; the radiating figure is 4.5; and the applicator surface temperature does not exceed 45 degrees. The console carries an eight-inch screen, measures 370 by 85 by 320 mm, weighs 3.5 kg and takes 220 V at 50 Hz or 110 V at 60 Hz.

Machine power describes what the console draws from the socket, not what the applicator puts into tissue. Acoustic output is bounded by two other published figures instead: effective intensity and the radiating area it acts over. Taking the radiating figure as 4.5 square centimetres, one watt per square centimetre corresponds to something near four and a half acoustic watts. A 60 watt supply sits a long way clear of that, and so would a considerably smaller one.

Which leaves a question the sheet does not answer. Two power figures are published, and nothing else on the specification separates them, down to a shared mass of 3.5 kg, and a doubled supply rarely arrives without weight. The extra input may drive a second channel, a second applicator, more headroom at continuous output, or nothing the patient encounters at all. None of that is described.

Medigear.uk lists the JC01-60W for UK business buyers. Before ordering, request from the seller what the 60-watt figure drives, the radiating area (with units), the device class and declaration of conformity, and the calibration interval.

In a therapy room, this console sits while a therapist works through a full list. Physiotherapy departments, rehabilitation units, sports and soft tissue clinics, and podiatry rooms all run appointments where the modality changes case by case, and an eight-inch screen on a 3.5-kilogram body means it goes to whichever room has a free couch rather than the couch coming to it.

What it can treat is settled by physics rather than preference. At three megahertz, the energy is absorbed within the first centimetre or two of tissue, which puts superficial tendon and muscle, myofascial trigger points, shallow calcific deposits, and scar tissue within its reach, and anything deeper outside it. No amount of adjustment to the console changes that boundary.

The harder decision is which of those presentations a service will actually offer it for. Guidance in the UK advises against ultrasound in low back pain and sciatica, and against it in osteoarthritis, where therapeutic exercise is named as the core treatment instead. A rotator cuff tendinopathy guideline published in 2025 reaches the same conclusion. Together, those account for much of what arrives at a musculoskeletal door, so the indication list should be written down before the console is switched on rather than worked out afterwards.

Procurement follows familiar paths. Trust musculoskeletal services, private clinics, podiatry groups and teaching institutions each work to their own rules, and a device in Class IIa or IIb passes clinical governance as well as finance. Conformity paperwork moves from the manufacturer to the buyer through the seller. Any adverse incident goes to the MHRA through the Yellow Card scheme.

The output parameters are published in full.

Frequency, effective intensity, duty cycle range, beam type, non-uniformity coefficient and an applicator temperature ceiling all appear. That is enough to check the console against a documented protocol on paper before anyone plugs it in.

Duty cycle spans the acute and chronic ends.

Twenty to eighty per cent, with automatic and continuous switching, covers both the largely non-thermal and the thermal ends of the usual protocol range. The clinician, not the equipment, makes the clinical choice.

An applicator temperature ceiling is stated.

Not exceeding 45 degrees at the head surface is a boundary an operator can hold the console to. The applicator is in skin contact for the whole treatment, so a published limit is worth having.

Intensity sits well inside the international limit

Effective intensity reaches one watt per square centimetre against a ceiling of three for therapy machines. That covers the range documented for superficial work at three megahertz without the console being capable of running far past it.

Frequency and intensity point at the same work

Three megahertz is the superficial frequency, and the published intensity range matches what the literature recommends for superficial treatment. The two specifications agree, which not every sheet in this category does.

The sheet includes a non-uniformity coefficient.

Putting a number on beam evenness gives an operator something concrete about hot spots, and gives a buyer something checkable. At 6 it sits inside the accepted band, and it converts directly into technique.

A console that barely occupies the bench

Eighty-five millimetres deep, 3.5 kg, with an eight-inch screen. It lives at the back of a treatment bench or on a small trolley and moves between rooms without a second person.

Every open question is answerable in writing.

What the sixty-watt figure drives: the radiating area with units, the depth measurement method, the class and certificate, the registration and the calibration interval. All of it exists in the manufacturer's file, and how completely it comes back says something useful about the supplier.

Machine power: 60 W

Input power is published at 60 watts. This describes mains draw rather than acoustic output, and it doesn't explain what the figure represents.

Three megahertz operating frequency

Operation is fixed at 3 MHz. That is the frequency chosen where the target lies close to the surface, and no alternative is offered.

Effective intensity to 1 W/cm²

One watt per square centimetre is given as the effective maximum. Therapy machines are limited internationally to three, so this sits comfortably below it.

Energy scale 1 to 10

Output is selected on a scale from 1 to 10. Nothing maps those steps onto watts per square centimetre.

Duty cycle 20 to 80 per cent

The pulsed range is adjustable end to end, and switching is described as automatic and continuous. Neither the individual ratios nor the timer range appears.

Beam non-uniformity coefficient 6

Peak intensity divided by the average across the radiating area is given as 6. The generally accepted range is three to seven, and anything beyond eight is treated as unsafe.

Collimating beam type

The beam is labelled collimation type, with no profile, divergence figure or measurement method attached to the label.

Radiating figure 4.5

Published as "4.5centimetress". Effective radiating area is an area in square centimetres, defined as the smallest area passing three quarters of the acoustic power, so the units need confirming before using the figure in any calculation.

Applicator surface temperature not exceeding 45 °C

An upper limit for the part of the device that rests against skin. Neither the measurement conditions nor the duration are given.

Maximum penetration depth given as 12 cm

Published as a maximum penetration depth. Half-value depth at three megahertz is commonly put between one and two and a half centimetres, so what this figure measures needs establishing.

Eight-inch screen

An eight-inch screen provides the controls. Nothing describes its resolution, whether it can store protocols, which languages it offers, or whether it records sessions.

Console dimensions 370 × 85 × 320 mm

Published at those dimensions with a net mass of 3.5 kg, packed at 465 × 380 × 375 mm and 6.5 kg. The same figures are carried against both published power ratings.

Dual rated voltage

Either 220 V at 50 Hz or 110 V at 60 Hz. The sheet does not say whether one unit covers both or two builds exist.

Applicators, calibration and marking not published

No applicator count or head sizes, no coupling gel provision, no calibration interval or method, no device class, no marking, no Approved Body number, no MHRA registration and no UK Responsible Person appears anywhere.

The JC01-60W publishes a genuinely full output specification: frequency, effective intensity, duty cycle range, beam type, non-uniformity coefficient and an applicator temperature ceiling. What it does not do is explain its own headline number. Machine power is what the console draws, while what reaches tissue is set by intensity and radiating area, both of which are published separately and neither of which moves with the power rating on this sheet. Two entries also need correcting before the figures travel any further: the radiating-area units and the twelve-centimetre depth. Medigear.uk lists the JC01-60W for UK business buyers and can arrange delivery, installation, commissioning, familiarisation and service cover. Request from the seller in the quotation what the sixty-watt figure drives, the radiating area (with units), the device class, and the calibration interval.

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

Everything buyers need to know about sourcing medical equipment through MediGear.

Nothing the sheet explains, which is the first thing to settle. Machine power is the mains input. What reaches the patient depends on effective intensity and the area the applicator radiates over, and both are published independently: 1 watt per square centimetre and a radiating figure of 4.5. Together, those put maximum acoustic output near four and a half watts, which no reasonable supply would struggle to deliver. So the extra input is doing something else: a second output channel, a larger or additional applicator, more thermal headroom in continuous mode, or simply a different power supply fitted for other reasons. Ask which, and ask whether any of it changes what the patient receives.

A fair question to put to the seller, because supplies with different ratings usually differ in weight. The sheet publishes one console mass of 3.5 kg, one set of dimensions and one packed weight, alongside two machine power figures. Either the masses are approximations carried across both, or the two share a supply and the power figure describes something other than the transformer. Ask for the mass of the variant actually being quoted, and ask whether the two builds differ physically at all.

Not as a therapeutic depth. Ultrasound absorption rises with frequency, so tissue absorbs three megahertz quickly, while one megahertz travels further. Published half-value depths at three megahertz sit between roughly one and two and a half centimetres, and standard dose tables leave about a quarter of the surface energy at four centimetres. That is exactly why three megahertz is selected for superficial structures. Twelve centimetres sits far outside that range and may be describing a depth at which pressure remains detectable rather than one at which a useful dose arrives. Ask what was measured, by what method, and against what threshold.

It reads as a units slip that should be corrected before the figure is published anywhere. Effective radiating area is an area in square centimetres, defined in the measurement standard for physiotherapy ultrasound as the smallest area through which three quarters of the acoustic power passes. Four and a half square centimetres is an ordinary treatment head. Four and a half centimetres as a length is not a radiating area. The distinction matters here because the acoustic output calculation depends on it. Ask for the figure with units and the measurement method.

It indicates how evenly the energy leaves the head, and therefore how carefully it must be moved. The coefficient compares the highest intensity anywhere in the beam against the average across the radiating area. Values from three to seven are generally regarded as acceptable and anything above eight as unsafe. At 6, the peak is around six times the average, which sits in the upper half of the accepted band. In practice, that is an instruction: keep the applicator moving at a steady pace, treat an area rather than a point, and do not let it rest.

Enough that the indication list should be settled before purchase. NICE guidance states that ultrasound should not be offered for low back pain with or without sciatica, and the 2022 osteoarthritis guidance likewise recommends against it, placing therapeutic exercise as the core treatment. A Cochrane review of chronic low back pain concluded that the current evidence does not support its use, and a 2025 rotator cuff tendinopathy guideline recommends against it as well. Weaker and more mixed signals remain for myofascial pain, calcific tendinitis and knee osteoarthritis. A service should decide and record what it will use the console for.

Not published, and the answer matters more here than on most equipment. Output from a therapy head drifts with use, and the particular standard for this class sets a tolerance between what the console displays and what the head delivers. Surveys of machines in clinical use have found large proportions outside that tolerance, with figures approaching seventy per cent reported by work linked to the UK national measurement laboratory, and over-delivering devices associated with skin burns. Verification needs a radiation force balance, so it is a service arrangement rather than a clinic task. Ask for the interval, the method and the UK service route.

Not stated anywhere. Only three megahertz appears, which confines the console to superficial structures. Services with a mixed caseload usually want both frequencies so that depth is chosen per presentation rather than fixed by the machine. Ask whether a one megahertz head exists for this console, whether it is interchangeable, and whether the unit detects which head is fitted and adjusts accordingly.

Under UK MDR 2002, an active therapeutic device intended to administer energy falls under Rule 9, giving Class IIa unless the energy may be administered in a potentially hazardous way, in which case it is Class IIb. Both involve a UK Approved Body, so a numbered certificate exists. Registration with the MHRA is required before the device reaches the Great Britain market, and a manufacturer established outside the UK must appoint a UK Responsible Person whose details appear on the labelling or instructions. None of that is on the sheet. Ask for the class, the certificate and body number, the registration and the named responsible person.

Any buyer choosing between the two published power figures without knowing what separates them, because this sheet says nothing. Any service whose caseload is mainly low back pain or osteoarthritis, given what guidance says. Any clinic needing to reach deeper structures, since three megahertz alone will not. And anyone unable to obtain a calibration interval. For a clinic treating superficial soft tissue, with a defined indication list and a calibration arrangement already running, the output specification here is unusually complete.